Climate Change and Nepal


  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 1,370 other followers

  • Join NYCA Googlegroups

    Google Groups
    Nepalese Youth for Climate Action (NYCA)
    Visit this group
  • Blog Categories

  • Blogpost Archive

  • Recent posts

  • Hits !

    • 42,901 friends
  • Advertisements

Money Matters: Ramblings on Adaptation Finance

Posted by NYCA Blogger on October 5, 2009

Rishi, blogging from Bangkok

Funds are needed to make sure that people can adapt to the impacts of climate change. Of course, the most vulnerable are those with the least capacity to adapt The question is, how do we generate the necessary funds to support adaptation? Can we assess contributions from Annex 1 countries? Make them contribute 1.5% of collective Annex 1 GDP? Is this even possible given that countries have not even met their ODA targets of 0.7% of GDP?

At the other end of the climate finance spectrum, we have the carbon offset market. However, relying on the market for a large share of the proceeds for adaptation is not an effective way to generate funds and this has a number of reasons:

a. if we look at the distribution of CDM projects, they are mostly in India and China, they alone account for 60% of the projects. The most vulnerable countries do not even have CDM projects.

b. Revenue from CDM money is not predictable nor is it adequate. Furthermore, the transaction costs associated with CDM are simply way too high

c. The market will operate such that the money will go to the sectors where the largest amount of carbon offsets will be created with the least amount of money. This is the reason for the popularity of HFC reducing projects under the CDM

d. There is a perception amongst LDCs that CDMs and other market mechanisms are actually grant money. This is either a gross misunderstanding about the nature of CDM and its primary feature of it being a flexibility mechanism or developed countries have sold flexible mechanisms to developing countries as grants and have eschewed from their responsibility of making stringent emission reductions.

One option that is currently in place is through levies on CDM credits that go to the Adaptation Fund. Some have called on to include a levy on all offsets and not just the CDM to increase the base. However, as one might argue, why should we tax projects in developing countries to fund adaptation activities in developing countries? This is not in line with historical responsibility and climate and adaption debt at all.
An approach that has been incessantly highlighted in the negotiating text (INF.1 and INF.2) among other documents, is integrating adaptation into national policies, esp development ones. Any sort of development policy articulated must take into account climate change and incorporate climate risk management. LDCs, because they have a lot to achieve in terms of building infrastructure and other necessary pillars of development, have a unique opportunity to integrate climate risk into development projects. Besides, it just makes economic sense to prepare for climate risks now instead of paying much more later on by ignoring such risks.

However, if climate change policy is fully integrated into development, what does this mean in terms of funding? Will donors point to such integrations to make an excuse to provide funding that is not additional to ODA? How can we separate an independent pool of funds and call that adaptation oriented if developing countries are being pressurized to incorporate and align all development priorities with climate change?

What exactly is an adaptation action? Can there ever be a clear distinction between adaptation needs and development needs? Are countries now going to be asked to show enough scientific backing to be eligible for funds? Should we just ask for 2% of ODA and use that for adaptation as well? Questions, questions, questions.


3 Responses to “Money Matters: Ramblings on Adaptation Finance”

  1. Hey, I found your blog while searching on Google. I have a blog on online stock trading, I’ll bookmark your site.

  2. Marc Shaw said

    Hey, I read a lot of blogs on a daily basis and for the most part, people lack substance but, I just wanted to make a quick comment to say GREAT blog!…..I”ll be checking in on a regularly now….Keep up the good work! 🙂

    – Marc Shaw

  3. Pratima said

    Uhhuh…@ Not myself: I dint understand a word of the prev comment you wrote… loss!

    Anyways, adding to what Rishi dai asserted, I would like to share my today’s experience whilw I went to search some funds for our “CFL for 350” campaign for the 24th of Oct. There was this dealer who acted as if he would certainly become eligible for Nobel peace prize if he was to help us. After much pushing and convincing from our side, he agreed to give us 30% discount deal on the CFL bulbs, 50% being our initial demand. However, we promised to promoted their company through our pamphlets and fliers. Whew! searching for funds is hard. I cant imagine how difficlut it must be for the developing countries to ask for fundfs, which is their right anyway, in the conferences. Money must really, really matter if one has to make so much effort to gain it.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: